<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rear tire clearance is hard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alexwetmore.org/archives/573/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alexwetmore.org/archives/573</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 15:41:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TeacherForex</title>
		<link>http://alexwetmore.org/archives/573/comment-page-1#comment-4445</link>
		<dc:creator>TeacherForex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 22:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/alex_wetmore/archive/2009/03/24/rear-tire-clearance-is-hard.aspx#comment-4445</guid>
		<description>Very interesting article, i have bookmarked your blog for future referrence. Best regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting article, i have bookmarked your blog for future referrence. Best regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlexWetmore</title>
		<link>http://alexwetmore.org/archives/573/comment-page-1#comment-4444</link>
		<dc:creator>AlexWetmore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 20:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/alex_wetmore/archive/2009/03/24/rear-tire-clearance-is-hard.aspx#comment-4444</guid>
		<description>Oh, and for the record a 5 degree bend will solve the issue.  I can&#039;&#039;t buy prebent stays with that bend, so I&#039;&#039;ll have to do it myself.  That isn&#039;&#039;t too much work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and for the record a 5 degree bend will solve the issue.  I can&#8221;t buy prebent stays with that bend, so I&#8221;ll have to do it myself.  That isn&#8221;t too much work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlexWetmore</title>
		<link>http://alexwetmore.org/archives/573/comment-page-1#comment-4443</link>
		<dc:creator>AlexWetmore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 20:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/alex_wetmore/archive/2009/03/24/rear-tire-clearance-is-hard.aspx#comment-4443</guid>
		<description>Andre -- It is where S-bend chainstays come in.  I think they are overkill for 50mm wide tires though, and don&#039;&#039;t really care for the look.

Val -- I already lengthened the chainstays 1cm to make life easier.  Not sure I want to go 2cm.  Part of this is the challenge, life isn&#039;&#039;t fun without some good challenges.

I wish I had titled this post &quot;Rear tire clearance is harder than it looks&quot;.  Guess I could change it.  The goal was more to show some of the challenges in building fat tired road bikes rather than complaining.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andre &#8212; It is where S-bend chainstays come in.  I think they are overkill for 50mm wide tires though, and don&#8221;t really care for the look.</p>
<p>Val &#8212; I already lengthened the chainstays 1cm to make life easier.  Not sure I want to go 2cm.  Part of this is the challenge, life isn&#8221;t fun without some good challenges.</p>
<p>I wish I had titled this post &#8220;Rear tire clearance is harder than it looks&#8221;.  Guess I could change it.  The goal was more to show some of the challenges in building fat tired road bikes rather than complaining.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Val</title>
		<link>http://alexwetmore.org/archives/573/comment-page-1#comment-4442</link>
		<dc:creator>Val</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 16:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/alex_wetmore/archive/2009/03/24/rear-tire-clearance-is-hard.aspx#comment-4442</guid>
		<description>So, have you considered a slightly longer wheelbase (silly question, of course you have)?  It wouldn&#039;&#039;t take much; even 1cm would help, and would make the ride more comfy and stable, as well as being able to handle loads on the rear a bit better.  I know you&#039;&#039;re well aware of all this, and a longer chainstay would probably still require some manipulation to wind up in all the right places, but it could make the whole issue a bit easier to deal with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, have you considered a slightly longer wheelbase (silly question, of course you have)?  It wouldn&#8221;t take much; even 1cm would help, and would make the ride more comfy and stable, as well as being able to handle loads on the rear a bit better.  I know you&#8221;re well aware of all this, and a longer chainstay would probably still require some manipulation to wind up in all the right places, but it could make the whole issue a bit easier to deal with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andre</title>
		<link>http://alexwetmore.org/archives/573/comment-page-1#comment-4441</link>
		<dc:creator>andre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 16:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/alex_wetmore/archive/2009/03/24/rear-tire-clearance-is-hard.aspx#comment-4441</guid>
		<description>iSn&#039;&#039;t thiS wereS &quot;S&quot; chainStayS come in? Hardly classic looking unless you say it is an old English design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>iSn&#8221;t thiS wereS &#8220;S&#8221; chainStayS come in? Hardly classic looking unless you say it is an old English design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlexWetmore</title>
		<link>http://alexwetmore.org/archives/573/comment-page-1#comment-4440</link>
		<dc:creator>AlexWetmore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 23:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/alex_wetmore/archive/2009/03/24/rear-tire-clearance-is-hard.aspx#comment-4440</guid>
		<description>Ladia -- Many bikes have chainstays which are ovalized in that region.  That is called a round-oval-round chainstay.  Here is an example from my old Bridgestone XO-1:
http://phred.org/~alex/pictures/bikes/xo1/xo1-chainstays.jpg

You can also intent the chainstay as Alistair did on his 650B bike:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/duncancycles/2689389729/in/set-72157604494651833/

Most traditional steel frames have straight chainstays which aren&#039;&#039;t manipulated this way.  You don&#039;&#039;t need to when the frame is built for tires up to around 32mm.  It&#039;&#039;s when you get into 40-60mm tires that things get more challenging.

Longer chainstays make this easier (because the tire is farther from the bottom bracket) and shorter ones make it more difficult.

Mountain bikes typically have smaller chainrings and wider cranks which also makes this easier.  It&#039;&#039;s not impossible to nail it and get fat tires, skinny cranks, and large chainrings, but it does take more thinking and measuring.  It&#039;&#039;s these small things that make the difference between a good frame and a great one in my eyes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ladia &#8212; Many bikes have chainstays which are ovalized in that region.  That is called a round-oval-round chainstay.  Here is an example from my old Bridgestone XO-1:<br />
<a href="http://phred.org/~alex/pictures/bikes/xo1/xo1-chainstays.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://phred.org/~alex/pictures/bikes/xo1/xo1-chainstays.jpg</a></p>
<p>You can also intent the chainstay as Alistair did on his 650B bike:<br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/duncancycles/2689389729/in/set-72157604494651833/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/duncancycles/2689389729/in/set-72157604494651833/</a></p>
<p>Most traditional steel frames have straight chainstays which aren&#8221;t manipulated this way.  You don&#8221;t need to when the frame is built for tires up to around 32mm.  It&#8217;&#8217;s when you get into 40-60mm tires that things get more challenging.</p>
<p>Longer chainstays make this easier (because the tire is farther from the bottom bracket) and shorter ones make it more difficult.</p>
<p>Mountain bikes typically have smaller chainrings and wider cranks which also makes this easier.  It&#8217;&#8217;s not impossible to nail it and get fat tires, skinny cranks, and large chainrings, but it does take more thinking and measuring.  It&#8217;&#8217;s these small things that make the difference between a good frame and a great one in my eyes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ladia</title>
		<link>http://alexwetmore.org/archives/573/comment-page-1#comment-4439</link>
		<dc:creator>Ladia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/alex_wetmore/archive/2009/03/24/rear-tire-clearance-is-hard.aspx#comment-4439</guid>
		<description>Do you know any bike which has not chain stays --uhh deformed (sorry for m,y english I am not native speaker) in places which you are pointing to.
Most bike makers resolve these clearance issues by simple cold bending (means simply hammering) a bit of tubes inside so everything fits well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you know any bike which has not chain stays &#8211;uhh deformed (sorry for m,y english I am not native speaker) in places which you are pointing to.<br />
Most bike makers resolve these clearance issues by simple cold bending (means simply hammering) a bit of tubes inside so everything fits well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://alexwetmore.org/archives/573/comment-page-1#comment-4438</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/alex_wetmore/archive/2009/03/24/rear-tire-clearance-is-hard.aspx#comment-4438</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;&#039;t you just use duct tape or something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8221;t you just use duct tape or something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lee</title>
		<link>http://alexwetmore.org/archives/573/comment-page-1#comment-4437</link>
		<dc:creator>lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/alex_wetmore/archive/2009/03/24/rear-tire-clearance-is-hard.aspx#comment-4437</guid>
		<description>fatties fit fine, eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fatties fit fine, eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
